Stop Insuring Mortgages
December 17, 2009An interesting article by John Stossell in the Post-Tribune:
The Federal Housing Administration announced this week that it wants tougher rules on mortgage lenders. It’s about time.
Maybe FHA got spooked by the recent New York Times story titled “Easy Loans to Wealthier Areas,” which said: “In its efforts to prop up a shattered housing market, the government is greatly extending its traditional support of real estate, including guaranteeing the mortgages of middle-class and even upper-class buyers against default” (http://tinyurl.com/y8lbeod ).
The Times explained that San Francisco, one of the priciest real estate markets in the country, had no government-insured mortgages two years ago, but now “the government is guaranteeing an average of six mortgages a week here. … The Federal Housing Administration is underwriting loans at quadruple the rate of three years ago even as its reserves to cover defaults are dwindling.”
And some of those loans are surely questionable.
The Times explains that 27-year-old Mike Rowland and his friends were able to buy a two-unit apartment building for almost a million dollars. “They had only a little cash to bring to the table but, with the federal government insuring the transaction, a large down payment was not necessary.”
“It was kind of crazy we could get this big a loan,” Rowland said.
Yes, it was crazy. Such policies do not end well. Young Rowland gets that. Even the Times does: “With government finances already under great strain, the policy expansions are creating new risks for American taxpayers.”
But our leaders plunge ahead, with your money. Has the administration forgotten that today’s financial mess was precipitated in part by government’s moves to encourage mortgage lending to unqualified or at best unproven borrowers? In the 1990s, the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, concerned that blacks and Hispanics were “underserved,” issued guidelines to banks stating: “Policies regarding applicants with no credit history or problem credit history should be reviewed. Lack of credit history should not be seen as a negative factor …” (http://tinyurl.com/d3aa28 ).
Soon, the lower standards spilled into the prime-mortgage market.





jgramins on Twitter
2109 Followers
hostnprofit
HaworthChris
dance_steps
MCBENTLEYPA
love_vacations
ME_Leclerc
ColonelHarts
ozawahokkaido
AmythystAmrylis
greenenergyguy1
juliasmola
BigBookofYou
MilwaukeeAHL
RepRibble
Rbecca1h
sg_re
AutomatedFilter
drewromejuliana
AthleticFoodie
andrewschneider
UNITSMilwaukee
Blevis
walktheway
MilwRealtor
CandidCarrie
ACDLiberty
thelgngroup
FreedomFounders
GiuliaKnop
AEAnneElizabeth
kirsty_king
minefox1211
jcdavid_rei
iprosperity
hiking_il
PatrickRiddle
PLWSC
connect2agent
b0929
cruzzer22
jude_loren
ChrisKnight
benjaminspector
DanMotor
LeaderListings
MilSuckee
pink_floyd_fan
billpking
AllRegs
LakeshoreSTPark
JonTiegs
NoahsArkWaterpk
HarborCenter_PW
Cgbwebbe
zenoftom
MrSportsbookGam
gre8impressions
ChicagoNewbie
ChadLeeCongress
HearAndProfit
GaREIA
MenomoneePatch
stevenmarcy
Auto_Gps
SuesPrimeMLM
JohnPruitt
happychatty
JohnFreeze27
PaulBParsons
GOPVictoryPrint
knightrunner22
myHRhelper
Emperor_Bob
Lisa_Fabiani
MyCreditDoc
SentryLiquor
Marveljth
GMarketingGuy
stockretweet
WiredWI
JohnFriedrichs
realestatexprts
SocioFocus
BEST_TEAM
joshschoenly
taylormarek
danceforjoy_7
LakeLawnResort
RTORealty
DanielPeterson
SashaTarkovsky
EnvyMilwaukee
PriscillaJetA
scotthodge
XRAYCAT7
social_organize
sussex4454
critter_TV
glitterangel369
CarolynSellsWI